Jeff Sessions, Medicare and Medicaid, Payment rates
$60 Billion In Improper Payments Should Prompt a Health Care CrackdownShare on:
October 18, 2017
$60 Billion In Improper Payments Should Prompt a Health Care Crackdown
By Adrian Velasquez Originally published in The Hill.
Medicare currently services around 56 million people, which includes those who are 65 and older, as well as disabled people of any age. Out of those eligible for Medicare, approximately 19 million chose to enroll in Medicare Advantage plans instead of standard Medicare. As the tremendous numbers of baby boomers continue to retire, federal officials predict the Medicare Advantage option will continue to grow.
Although participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs is on a voluntary basis for hospitals, not-for-profit hospitals are required to care for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in order to receive their federal tax exemption status. Hospitals generally choose to participate, since Medicare and Medicaid generally account for more than 60 percent of all care provided by hospitals.
Payment rates for Medicare and Medicaid are currently set lower than the costs of providing the necessary care. This results in underpayment. Medicare payments that are lower than the actual costs affect 64 percent of hospitals, while 60 percent of hospitals are underpaid due to Medicaid. Hospitals are generally only receiving payments of 88 cents for every dollar hospitals are spending for Medicare, while Medicaid is slightly higher at 90 cents for every dollar spent.
The payment error rate for standard Medicare in 2016 alone was found to be at 11 percent, which translates to $41 billion. At a minimum, minor mistakes can be found in four out of five U.S. medical bills, which costs $68 billion annually in unjustified health-care spending for both patients and doctors.
Health care industry standards are constantly evolving, and physician staff and doctors alike lack the much-needed training on new medical coding updates. This leads to improper coding and not classifying a patient’s diagnosis into the required medical numeric codes doctor’s offices have to use to get government insurance reimbursement for the services rendered.
Common billing errors include, duplicate charges, incorrect patient information, increased quantities, in-network balance billing, and separating bundled procedures. Charges for tests or procedures canceled prior to services, misrepresentation of a patient’s diagnosis to a higher cost one, and increased times for being under anesthesia or in the operation room cover some of the other frequently found billing mistakes. Another issue is price gouging on medical bills, such as charging $23 for one alcohol swab or $53 for a pair of non-sterile gloves.
There is an obvious need to eliminate the errors, improper payments and fraud. The director of health care reviews for the Government Accountability Office, James Cosgrove, reported to the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee that, “Fundamental changes are necessary” when it comes to Medicare and Medicaid Services. There needs to be a better way to find billing mistakes as well as recouping overpayment from health insurers.
As the crackdown on health care fraud forges on, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in July 2017 that there were 412 people arrested with approximately 100 doctors among them. Those arrested are charged with a variety of health care fraud schemes, mostly related to Medicare, that swindled the government out of about $1.3 billion.
As one of the most heavily regulated industries, health-care providers have a multitude of intricate rules and regulations to be mindful of and they are growing exponentially every day. Health-care providers attempting to manage the risks associated with the ever-evolving regulatory landscape have designated a chief compliance officer (CCO) to navigate the landscape. However, 43 percent of CCOs surveyed reported having other responsibilities as well. More than 30 percent of health-care provider respondents reported that their total annual budget for compliance and related activities to be $1 million or higher.
Many hospital systems are notorious for tracking and dedicating hundreds of hours of staff time to conform to compliance audit directives. These audits are generated by Medicare to recoup revenue and tend to follow patterns of overpayments to hospital providers.
A leader in predictive analytics and compliance tools for hospitals and large health networks, Fi-Med, notes that using technology to locate “behavioral” coding issues can prevent incorrect billing while saving millions of dollars for hospital networks. Furthermore, health-care providers who use analytics to improve their internal processes as well as an instrument to identify red flags are dramatically improving their compliance risk and bottom line.
It is optimal to eliminate overpayments as well as underpayments. Targeted analytics are a key component to turning non-protected health information data instantly into a comprehensive report that not only mitigates risk for compliance violations, but also finds lost revenue to hospital systems.
Adrian E. Velasquez is the founder of Fi-Med Management. Their mission is to bring business acumen and compliance expertise to health care providers throughout the United States. Velasquez's has extensive experience as a systems administrator and national health-care consultant.
Check back often for the latest Fi-Med news, or subscribe to updates below.